Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk association between HOMA-IR and uPOR

From: Association of HOMA-IR with unexpected poor ovarian response in non-obese women in poseidon 1: a retrospective cohort study

Variable

Crude Model

Model 1

Model 2

OR (95%CI)

P value

OR (95%CI)

P value

OR (95%CI)

P value

Ln HOMA-IR

1.23 (1.12, 1.34)

< 0.0001

1.24 (1.11, 1.37)

< 0.0001

1.25 (1.12, 1.39)

< 0.0001

HOMA-IR tertile

      

 T1 (< 1.75)

Reference (1.0)

 

Reference (1.0)

 

Reference (1.0)

 

 T2 (1.75–2.75)

1.24 (1.10, 1.40)

0.0006

1.22 (1.07, 1.39)

0.0027

1.20 (1.05, 1.37)

0.0062

 T3 (≥ 2.75)

1.32 (1.17, 1.50)

< 0.0001

1.32 (1.14, 1.52)

0.0001

1.33 (1.15, 1.54)

0.0001

P for trend

 

< 0.0001

 

0.0003

 

0.0002

  1. *Crude model adjusted for none; Model 1 adjusted for: age, BMI, AMH, and BFSH; Model 2 adjusted for: age, BMI, AMH, BFSH, initial Gn dose, AFC, and PCOS. The model 1 and model 2 used multivariable logistic regression analysis